All of this depends on the man, I assume.

Some might want to get their way, no matter what. Others might not understand that when you say you’re sticking to a budget, you mean it.

For many, eating is part of bonding, so sharing a meal with others is the point. It’s such a classic part of our “good date” cultural narrative – dinner and a movie. 

I understand that way of thinking – because there is something great about sitting and listening, whether it’s over coffee, a waffle, or a full meal.

A big expensive dinner might not seem worth it to you. But I can understand why some men might feel like a movie or show isn’t enough – especially on an early date. There’s very little time for talking and getting to know someone.

Would you consider coffee, dessert, or an affordable dinner for first and second dates? The early ones? Once you know someone well enough, you can try dinner at home, maybe at your place, and then go for the the show/movie/bowling/whatever.

Last thought: you prefer activities to meals, but if you’re up for it, there’s a way to turn sustenance into an experience. Like many in Boston, I’ve been thinking I should try 7th Street Burger and the sandwich from All’antico Vinaio (separately). Those dining experiences are about $7 and and $18 respectively. They will give me a lot to talk about – with a significant other.

Perhaps I can ask our food critic for a list of restaurants that are inexpensive, a unique experience, and give two first daters plenty to say.

– Meredith

Readers? Thoughts on who pays, budgets, and men not wanting to eat alone?

What’s on your mind about relationships? Breakups? Friendships? Hot person at coffee shop? Send letters to [email protected] or use the anonymous form.