Here’s how New York media covered the Celtics’ Game 1 loss
New York media outlets had fun at the Celtics’ expense after their disastrous loss Monday night.
More with the Celtics
On Monday night, the Celtics gave up a 20-point second-half lead in an eventual 108-105 loss to the New York Knicks. On Tuesday morning, Boston media outlets covered what went wrong, and what the Celtics need to do to bounce back. On the opposite end, New York sports media reveled in the Knicks’ comeback and what this game could mean for the rest of the series.
Here are some of the media content from the Knicks’ perspective:
NY Daily News Sports
“If objects in the rear-view mirror are closer than they appear, it’s time for the Celtics to start watching their back. Because the Knicks just stole Game 1 from underneath their feet. And now, what was supposed to be a dead series is very much alive,” wrote Kristian Winfield.
If objects in the rear-view mirror are closer than they appear, it’s time for the Celtics to start watching their back.
— NY Daily News Sports (@NYDNSports) May 6, 2025
Because the Knicks just stole Game 1 from underneath their feet. What was supposed to be a dead series is very much alive. @krisplashedhttps://t.co/VlJXTOV1Gp
The Athletic
“After all, it was the Knicks who scraped, clawed and prevailed out of a first-round series, not the tough-and-rugged Pistons. It was the Knicks, down 20 in Game 1 of a second-round matchup against the Boston Celtics on Monday night, who won the game, not the team with championship rings,” wrote James L. Edwards III.
Maybe, after all of this, the New York Knicks that got you to fall back in love are still here. Still tough. Still gritty. Still clutch.
— James L. Edwards III (@JLEdwardsIII) May 6, 2025
The New York Knicks deserve respect.
My column:https://t.co/F0c9WA7d9S
“For those who have been putting it out there that Celtics-Knicks isn’t a “real” rivalry since, after all, Boston has done most of the winning over the years, let the record show that the Knicks did some winning Monday night,” wrote Steve Buckley.
If you’ve never seen an NBA team miss 45 3-pointers in a playoff game, that’s because until Monday night, it had never happened.
— The Athletic (@TheAthletic) May 6, 2025
The Knicks were content to let the Celtics fire from deep, writes @BuckinBoston.
And it worked in Game 1.https://t.co/LdHdvtvvVh pic.twitter.com/u9iTAtuROQ
SNY
“Bridges’ shooting stats on Monday weren’t pretty. He went 3-for-13 and scored eight points (yes, he was 2-for-12 when he knocked down the baseline three in overtime). But those numbers don’t present an accurate picture of his impact. In addition to seven assists (and just one turnover), Bridges had three steals and two blocks in Game 1,” wrote Ian Begley.
“That’s who Mikal is. He’s (gotten) a lot of criticism & he never lets that affect him…He’s a winning player. He makes winning plays. He should be celebrated for that.”
— Ian Begley (@IanBegley) May 6, 2025
Mikal Bridges came up big for NYK in the final few minutes of his 51-minute Game 1: https://t.co/7YKhuZOdCH
New York Post
The back page: WICKED HAHD
— New York Post Sports (@nypostsports) May 5, 2025
Knicks not about to back down from huge Celtics challenge
Read more: https://t.co/UPow3ch6pb pic.twitter.com/iI3omckSfR
Everything Knicks
Mann if you’re not a Knicks fan you just don’t get it.
— EverythingKnicks (@EverythinKnicks) May 6, 2025
This win means so much to us. Yes it’s one game. Game 1. We know. But it means soooooooo much man. pic.twitter.com/Oc9gY8mamm
To comment, please create a screen name in your profile
To comment, please verify your email address
Conversation
This discussion has ended. Please join elsewhere on Boston.com