Sign up for the Today newsletter
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Weighing the pros and cons of a Pavel Zacha trade for the Bruins
Dealing away Zacha could net Boston a substantial return at some point this season.
Just three weeks into a new NHL season, the Bruins are linked to another intriguing trade rumor.
Pavel Zacha might have been spared from Boston’s trade-deadline teardown in March, but the 28-year-old forward is already attracting attention from several other teams across the league — especially as Boston continues to hover near the bottom of the Eastern Conference standings.
It looks as though the Vancouver Canucks have made it known that they would love to pluck the top-six pivot away from Boston.
After Rick Dhaliwal of CHEK in Vancouver reported last week that the Canucks were “working the phones” to try and acquire a center like Zacha, Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman agreed that Vancouver is fixated on the Bruins’ center.
Advertisement:
“That’s true, and I think it’s been going on for quite some time,” Friedman said of Dhaliwal’s report of Vancouver’s interest in Zacha while on “Hockey Night in Canada” last Saturday. “I think it’s all the way going back to the summer. The Canucks and Bruins have been on-off about this. Zacha is not in the last year of his deal.
“He has another year. Teams are looking for centers. Boston doesn’t have to do anything here it doesn’t want to do, but this has kind of been a dance, the Canucks and some other teams seeing if they can pry Zacha out of there. One thing about Vancouver, though, in this case, I do not believe they are on Zacha’s no-trade list.”
Advertisement:
While a player like Zacha would be a coveted trade target for several contending clubs this season, Friedman added on Monday that the Bruins don’t feel like “they’re in any rush.”
“Boston’s got a guy here that Vancouver and others have called about, and the Bruins are like, ‘No, we don’t have to do this, and we’re not going to do this unless we get what we want.’ So, obviously at this point, nothing has happened,” Friedman said on his “32 Thoughts” podcast on Monday.
As Friedman noted, the Bruins don’t need to move Zacha, especially this early into a new season.
But, Zacha’s future presents an interesting conundrum for the Bruins: what should a team seemingly in the midst of an arduous retool do with such a valuable asset?
The pros of dealing away Zacha — be it this fall or at the NHL trade deadline in March — are evident in terms of Boston’s long-term outlook.
There’s a lot to like about what Zacha offers, especially for a team looking to add another key cog on their second line.
Advertisement:
The Czech product is in his prime at 28 years old, and is signed through the end of the 2026-27 season at a very reasonable $4.75 million cap hit.
Beyond his favorable contract, Zacha presents plenty of value as a steady, two-way center who can also shift to the wing when needed. Over his three full years in Boston, Zacha has averaged 54 points per season and is on pace for a career-high 68 points in 2025-26.
Add in his faceoff capabilities (60.4 percent), and his ability to play both on the power play and penalty kill, and Zacha is the type of Swiss Army Knife that a top NHL club would love to add to their roster.
If the Bruins are staring at another lost season, dealing away Zacha would presumably net the largest return among Boston’s realistic trade chips — not counting franchise regulars like David Pastrnak, Charlie McAvoy, and Jeremy Swayman.
While Boston could presumably net some draft capital by parting with pending free agents like Andrew Peeke or Viktor Arvidsson, a player with both term and established production like Zacha could give Boston a chance to further accelerate their retool with more young talent.
A first-round pick would seemingly be a necessity in any trade involving Zacha. But, if Boston is holding out on a standout package for their 2C, could a team like the Canucks also part ways with a top prospect?
Advertisement:
After all, the New York Islanders landed a 2026 first-round pick, a conditional 2028 third-round pick, and one of the Avalanche’s top prospects in Calum Ritchie in exchange for center Brock Nelson, who was on an expiring contract last season.
It’s not a stretch that the Bruins could land a similar haul if they moved Zacha, with a top Canucks prospect like Tom Willander or Braeden Cootes further bolstering a burgeoning pipeline of young talent in Boston.
The cons for the Bruins stem from moving on from one of the few legitimate top-six talents on a roster already short on high-end skill, especially in 2026-27 when more young help should be on the way.
The Bruins invested in Morgan Geekie this past offseason (six years, $33 million) as a player who presumably will still help Boston once they come out on the other side of this retool. That same description could apply to Zacha.
As the Bruins presumably incorporate James Hagens and other younger players into the lineup over the next few seasons, surrounding those blue-chip skaters with reliable veterans like Pastrnak, Zacha, Geekie, and Elias Lindholm stands as a sound way to ease those youngsters into NHL action.
As TSN and The Athletic’s Pierre LeBrun noted on Tuesday, the Bruins aren’t solely viewing Zacha as a trade chip in the coming months.
“What I’m being told in terms of the Boston Bruins is that they view Pavel Zacha as a long-term fit,” LeBrun said. “He only has another year on his deal after this year, but don’t be surprised if they try to extend him this summer. They look at him at 28 years old as being age appropriate for this transition of their roster — the retool, whatever you want to call it. But they feel he fits in very well and they want to keep him around.”
Advertisement:
There’s no doubt that Zacha could be a good player for Boston in the coming years.
But, if the Bruins can’t pull themselves out of the bottom of the standings and set themselves on the right track, the best way to push through this middling stretch of hockey might be to focus on the future — even if that means parting with established talent like Zacha.
To comment, please create a screen name in your profile
To comment, please verify your email address
Conversation
This discussion has ended. Please join elsewhere on Boston.com