Sign up for the Today newsletter
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Don Sweeney, Bruins admit they faced some hard truths during head-coaching search
"It can be uncomfortable in terms of the critical eye that other people are watching your team and breaking down your team and the changes they want to make."
The Boston Bruins cast a wide net before ultimately naming Marco Sturm as the 30th head coach in franchise history.
“I think the number was 14 that I started with,” Don Sweeney said Tuesday of the number of coaching candidates Boston interviewed. “Some of them were initial conversations, but there was always one or two, so probably about 14.”
Most head-coaching interviews center around candidates mapping out their strengths, weaknesses, and visions for an NHL roster. However, it also offers teams the opportunity to have their organization audited by an outside voice.
And based on Sweeney’s comments on Tuesday, the Bruins and their top process had to get used to the “uncomfortable” reality that comes with those candid breakdowns.
Advertisement:
“The process in that sense — it can be uncomfortable in terms of the critical eye that other people are watching your team and breaking down your team and the changes they want to make,” Sweeney noted Tuesday. “You have to be open to all of it.
“You have to understand, the position we’re in, we didn’t execute both at the management level, coaching level, and player level. So we have to be open to that, and tweaks that coaches want to make.”
Said criticism isn’t without merit.
The Bruins had the fifth-worst record in the NHL during the 2024-25 season — with Boston’s offseason emphasis on adding size and physicality to the roster creating a grouping that was often too slow to keep up in today’s NHL and ill-equipped to generate consistent offense.
Advertisement:
Failing to account for the offseason departures of Jake DeBrusk, Danton Heinen, and James van Riemsdyk sapped Boston of its secondary-scoring depth.
Boston’s stout defensive structure folded, while the Bruins’ special-teams play regressed across the board.
Even with the brilliance of David Pastrnak (43 goals, 106 points), years spent either relinquishing draft capital or whiffing on young players dried up Boston’s prospect pipeline.
A much-needed influx of low-cost, impact players capable of supporting franchise regulars like Pastrnak, Brad Marchand, Charlie McAvoy, and others never arrived.
The bill had finally come due. And that inability to both build off the success of the 2023-24 season and develop a new wave of young talent was tough to ignore during Boston’s extended interview process.
“Thankfully coaches came in and gave their honest opinion and how they wanted to see things [with] the things you had done well, the things you hadn’t done well, and the outside perspective that teams have had for the Bruins organization over the years and the changes that have gone well and haven’t gone well during those years,” Sweeney said. “And success or not having success, and those are eye-opening at times, and it’s constructive.”
Advertisement:
“You have to take it to heart and make adjustments,” Boston’s GM added. “We’re not currently playing [in the Stanley Cup Final] right now, so you have to accept the failures that we have and coaches were honest in pointing that out.”
Player development will be a key part of Sturm’s unenviable task of righting the ship in Boston.
The Bruins have younger players knocking at the door in Fraser Minten and Matt Poitras, while Mason Lohrei is looking to bounce back from a lackluster 2024-25 campaign.
Barring more trades, the Bruins should have more blue-chip talents in their prospect pool thanks to the No. 7 pick in the 2025 NHL Draft – coupled with the haul of other picks Boston secured via its trade-deadline sell-off.
Sturm’s emphasis on player development shouldn’t necessarily come as much of a surprise.
During his time as head coach of the Ontario Reign (Los Angeles’ AHL affiliate), Sturm helped develop Kings lineup regulars like Quinton Byfield and Brandt Clarke. But Sturm himself also pointed to Boston’s flaws in developing players during his own interview process.
“Marco went through some of the things that he felt that we had done well but things that we had gotten away from and where the league is at and where the league is heading to,” Sweeney said. “It’s all important parts of it, and the player development part of it was certainly a big part of those conversations and how you do integrate the players and when they’re going to be ready and having connectivity with your minor-league program.”
To comment, please create a screen name in your profile
To comment, please verify your email address
Conversation
This discussion has ended. Please join elsewhere on Boston.com