Judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against The New York Times
The judge said that the complaint failed to contain a “short and plain statement of the claim.” Trump has 28 days to refile.
A federal judge in Florida on Friday threw out President Donald Trump’s defamation suit against The New York Times four days after it was filed, calling the complaint “improper and impermissible” in its present form.
The judge provided Trump’s lawyers with 28 days to file an amended complaint.
The lawsuit, which asked for $15 billion in damages, accused the Times and four of its reporters, as well as book publisher Penguin Random House, of disparaging Trump’s reputation as a successful businessperson.
But Judge Steven D. Merryday, of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, said the president’s 85-page complaint was unnecessarily lengthy and digressive. He criticized Trump’s lawyers for waiting until the 80th page to lodge a formal allegation of defamation, and for including, ahead of it, dozens of “florid and enervating” pages lavishing praise on the president and enumerating a range of grievances.
“A complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective,” Merryday wrote. “Not a protected platform to rage against an adversary.”
He said any revised complaint must be limited to 40 pages.
“We welcome the judge’s quick ruling, which recognized that the complaint was a political document rather than a serious legal filing,” a New York Times spokesperson said Friday. A Penguin Random House spokesperson said, “We applaud the judge’s decision.”
A spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said in a statement, “President Trump will continue to hold the Fake News accountable through this powerhouse lawsuit against The New York Times, its reporters and Penguin Random House, in accordance with the judge’s direction on logistics.”
The lawsuit was the latest broadside by a president who is spearheading the most severe government crackdown on media institutions in modern times. Trump sued The Wall Street Journal in July for an article concerning his relationship with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, and he has sued CBS News and ABC News over their news coverage, extracting a $16 million settlement from each network.
Trump’s complaint against the Times this week claimed that a series of articles before the 2024 election were aimed at hurting his candidacy and caused “enormous” damage to his “professional and occupational interests.” The defendants included the Times and four of its reporters — Peter Baker, Russ Buettner, Susanne Craig and Michael S. Schmidt — as well as Penguin Random House, which published a book about Trump by Craig and Buettner.
The president’s complaint objected to certain details and anecdotes in the Times’ coverage. But it also digressed into lengthy tributes to Trump, citing his “singular brilliance” and describing his 2024 election win as “the greatest personal and political achievement in American history.”
Merryday, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, referred to some of those asides as “tedious and burdensome” for a legal document, writing that “a complaint is not a megaphone for public relations.” He wrote that the complaint, as written, “stands unmistakably and inexcusably athwart” legal requirements that complaints must be “a short and plain statement of the claim.”
Merryday wrote that his order Friday “suggests nothing about the truth of the allegations or the validity of the claims but addresses only the manner of the presentation of the allegations in the complaint.”
Trump sued the Times in 2021 over an investigation into his financial history; the suit was dismissed, and Trump was ordered to pay the Times’ legal expenses. In 2020, his reelection campaign sued the newspaper for libel over an Opinion essay; that lawsuit was also dismissed.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
To comment, please create a screen name in your profile
To comment, please verify your email address
Conversation
This discussion has ended. Please join elsewhere on Boston.com