National News

Jury awards $50 million to California man burned by Starbucks tea

Michael Garcia, 30, underwent skin grafts on his genitals after a hot tea spilled on him in a Starbucks drive-thru in 2020, his lawyers said.

A jury in California on Friday awarded $50 million in damages to a Los Angeles delivery driver who was badly burned by a cup of hot tea that spilled into his lap in a Starbucks drive-thru in 2020, court records show.

The driver, Michael Garcia, 30, received multiple skin grafts and underwent other medical treatments on his genitals after a hot tea spilled on him when he picked it up from a drive-thru window in 2020, according to the negligence lawsuit, which was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

“This jury verdict is a critical step in holding Starbucks accountable for flagrant disregard for customer safety and failure to accept responsibility,” Nick Rowley, one of Garcia’s lawyers, said in a statement.

Advertisement:

In February 2020, Garcia, who was 25 at the time, was working for the delivery service Postmates when he arrived at a Starbucks in Los Angeles to pick up three venti-size hot teas, according to his lawyers.

The lawsuit claimed that the barista who was stationed at the window “negligently failed to properly” secure one of the hot drinks into a drink carrier, which caused it to fall out of the container and into Garcia’s lap. Video from inside the store captured the episode and shows Garcia writhing in pain as he pulls away.

His lawyers said the experience left him with third-degree burns to his penis, groin and inner thighs, and he was transported to an emergency room.

Advertisement:

Since he was hospitalized and treated, he “has lived for five years with the disfigurement, pain, dysfunction and psychological harm caused by the burns,” his lawyers said.

In a statement on Sunday, Starbucks said that although it sympathized with Garcia, the company planned to appeal the jury’s award.

“We disagree with the jury’s decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages awarded to be excessive,” Jaci Anderson, director of corporate communications, said in the statement.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

To comment, please create a screen name in your profile

Conversation

This discussion has ended. Please join elsewhere on Boston.com