Sign up for the Today newsletter
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Did the MFA’s nude performance push boundaries or go too far?
After the museum posted photos of Xandra Ibarra’s “Nude Laughing” performance, Instagram commenters were deeply divided.
The Museum of Fine Arts’ newest exhibition asks visitors to reconsider the nude in art. But one artist’s work is now stirring up controversy far beyond the museum walls.
“Subvert, Repair, Reclaim: Contemporary Artists Take Back the Nude,” which runs through Aug. 2, brings together work by 12 contemporary artists who engage with representations of the nude in Western art history. The museum says the exhibition examines themes of objectification, exploitation, erasure, power, bodily autonomy, and agency.
One of the works is Xandra Ibarra’s “Nude Laughing,” a performance piece that turned those ideas into something live, physical, and intentionally uncomfortable.
Advertisement:
On April 16, Ibarra walked through the MFA’s galleries completely nude, laughing continuously and pulling pantyhose filled with symbols of femininity behind her. Blonde hair, ballet shoes, furs, pearls, and fake breasts were all part of the piece, which the museum described as an exploration of race, gender, whiteness, and white womanhood.
The MFA’s event page warned that the performance contained nudity and “may not be suitable for all audiences.” But after the museum shared photos from the piece on Instagram, the performance found a much larger audience — and a much louder one.
Some commenters praised the work and argued that the strong reaction was part of the point.
Advertisement:
“If this artistic expression is provoking a strong response for you, then it’s doing exactly what art is supposed to do,” one commenter wrote. “Even better, maybe ask yourself why you’re having that reaction and start a conversation!”
Another commenter agreed, writing, “This is exactly what Performance Art is designed to do: uncover emotional response to something deeply rooted in humanity using the physical body as extension of the medium.”
Another commenter wrote that if people can look at the Statue of David and be fine but find this performance offensive, “there’s some cognitive dissonance happening.”
Others were less convinced saying the performance was “not art” and “the museum should be a quiet reflective space.” One questioned the premise of the work more broadly: “So where do we draw the line here?” the commenter wrote. “Nude woman walking around dragging a bag of clothes is art.”
The online debate raises a larger question: What should people expect from a museum like the MFA? Should contemporary art be allowed to provoke, confuse, or make visitors feel uncomfortable? Or did this performance cross a line?
Advertisement:
We want to hear from readers: Was the backlash to the MFA’s nude performance artist fair, or did people overreact?
Tell us in the form below or e-mail us at [email protected]. Your response may be featured in an upcoming Boston.com article.
Be civil. Be kind.
Read our full community guidelines.To comment, please create a screen name in your profile
To comment, please verify your email address