Sign up for the Today newsletter
Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.
Is Massachusetts doing enough to regulate online sports betting?
Amid scandals in pro sports and rising public health concerns, should Massachusetts reconsider how tightly it regulates online betting and prop wagers?
A string of high-profile scandals has put online sports betting under intense scrutiny, sparking debate about whether the industry’s rapid growth is outpacing the state’s ability to regulate it — and whether prop bets are creating new public health risks.
The latest controversy occurred on Nov. 9 when two Cleveland Guardians pitchers were indicted on charges that they took bribes to influence in-game outcomes that would help bettors win. Major League Baseball responded the next day, announcing that major sportsbooks — including FanDuel and Boston-based DraftKings — agreed to impose a nationwide $200 cap on “micro-bet” pitch wagers and to bar those bets from being bundled into parlays.
Advertisement:
The NBA has faced similar controversy over sports betting. In October, two former Celtics draft picks – Chauncey Billups and Terry Rozier – were indicted on separate illegal gambling charges. Rozier allegedly used private insider information to illegally help sports betters, while Billups was charged in a separate indictment for rigging underground poker games.
These incidents have intensified concern over prop bets — wagers on specific events or plays within a game that do not directly depend on the game’s final result – which public health advocates argue are uniquely addictive because of their rapid-fire nature and round-the-clock availability.
Advertisement:
Many bettors and sportsbooks, meanwhile, defend them as harmless ways to make games more engaging — and the companies’ robust revenue from sports betting reflects their popularity. Since Massachusetts launched sports wagering in-person in January 2023 and online in March 2023, the state has collected about $339 million in total taxes and assessments from licensed operators, according to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission.
At the same time, the broader gambling landscape is shifting. At a recent hearing of the Massachusetts Joint Committee on Economic Development and Emerging Technologies, Wynn Resorts — the dominant casino operator in the state which operates Encore Boston Harbor — urged legislators against legalizing online casino gaming, or iGaming.
Representatives from Encore Boston Harbor warned that iGaming could exacerbate problem gambling, undermine brick-and-mortar casino business, threaten its 3,000 employees, and reduce the roughly $15 million it contributes monthly to in state gaming taxes.
Massachusetts already bans prop bets on college athletes, and lawmakers are now weighing a proposal to ban prop bets altogether.
We want to know: Is Massachusetts doing enough to regulate online sports betting? Do you think the state — or the sports-betting industry at large — should crack down on prop bets?
Tell us by filling out the form or e-mailing us at [email protected], and your response may appear in a future Boston.com article.
Is Massachusetts doing enough to regulate online sports betting?
To comment, please create a screen name in your profile
To comment, please verify your email address
Conversation
This discussion has ended. Please join elsewhere on Boston.com